Practice prompt · Q:financial-statement-performance-and-returns/leverage-interpretation-001

Separate Ridge's asset return from leverage amplification

Uses independent company data to test why equal ROA can produce different ROE and what a defined debt ratio leaves unresolved.

Updated Sep 10, 2026 Review due Nov 7, 2026

Practice

Check your answer

Choose a response, then check the answer and explanation.

Summit and Ridge each report 10% ROA, but Ridge reports 30% ROE and Summit reports 20%. Ridge's defined ending debt is $190,000 against $320,000 total assets; Summit's is $90,000 against $330,000. Which explanation is supported?

Choose the best answer. A Ridge's higher ROE arises from its higher equity multiplier under equal ROA; financing cost, maturity, liquidity, covenants, and downside risk remain untested B Ridge's higher ROE proves higher operating efficiency because ROE is an operating ratio C Ridge has less leverage because its average equity is lower D Summit is safer because a lower multiplier always proves lower financial risk

Your answer stays on this page. It is not sent or saved.

Show explanationHide explanation

Answer: A

Choice A is correct. Ridge's 10% ROA times a 3.00 multiplier produces 30% ROE; Summit's 10% ROA times 2.00 produces 20%. The decomposition attributes the difference but does not establish the cost or risk of Ridge's financing. A debt-to-total-assets screen requires a separately declared debt definition and same-date total assets; it is not another name for the average-balance equity multiplier. Summit's defined ratio is 27.27%; Ridge's is 59.38%.