Practice prompt · Q:inventory-ownership-cost-flow-and-measurement/average-cost-001

Compare Northstar's periodic and moving averages

Tests unit weighting, purchase date recomputation, full precision control, and interpretation with an independent event stream.

Updated Sep 10, 2026 Review due Nov 8, 2026
Practice

Check your answer

Write your response and explain your reasoning.

Northstar begins with 30 units at $12. It buys 20 at $15, sells 25, buys 25 at $18, and sells 20. All units belong to one supported interchangeable pool.

Compute periodic weighted-average and perpetual moving-average cost of goods sold and ending inventory. Show each moving-rate recomputation, retain full precision, and reconcile units and cost. Explain why the two cost assignments differ and identify what the reconciliations do not prove.

Use ASC 330-10-30-9 for the US-GAAP cost-flow boundary and the official IAS 2 overview for its weighted-average description.

Compare your reasoning with the worked answer

Periodic weighted average uses 75 available units and $1,110 of cost. The rate is $14.80. Cost of goods sold is 45 units times $14.80, or $666. Ending inventory is 30 units times $14.80, or $444.

For the moving average, the first purchase creates 50 units costing $660, or $13.20 each. The 25-unit sale receives $330, leaving 25 units and $330. The next purchase creates 50 units costing $780, or $15.60 each. The 20-unit sale receives $312. Moving-average cost of goods sold is $642, and ending inventory is $468.

Both schedules end with 30 units and reconcile to $1,110. The periodic method applies the later $18 purchase across the full period. The moving method does not assign that later cost to the earlier sale. Neither reconciliation proves the pool, cost eligibility, event dates, or selected policy.