Worked example · EX:economics-and-market-foundations/test-linden-ceiling-and-floor

Test a Linden price ceiling and floor

Compare hypothetical maximum and minimum prices with equilibrium, compute the short side traded quantity and imbalance, and keep posted price separate from full incidence.

Updated Aug 7, 2026 Review due Nov 7, 2026
On this page
  1. Test bindingness first
  2. Compute the two imbalances
  3. Do not infer incidence from the displayed price
Worked-example setupScope and assumptions
  • The $50 ceiling and $70 floor are hypothetical teaching policies applied to the fictional Linden baseline market; no real law or policy advice is involved.
  • The baseline equilibrium is $60 and 800 chairs per week; both schedules remain fixed when the controlled prices are evaluated.
  • Completed exchange is bounded by the short-side quantity, but allocation, queues, search, side terms, quality, enforcement, production, and inventory are not modeled.
Period
One representative fictional week
Units
USD per qualifying chair and qualifying chairs per week
Rounding
Exact whole-dollar prices and whole-chair model quantities

Test bindingness first

Linden's baseline equilibrium is $60 per chair. A $50 maximum is below that benchmark and binds in the model. A $70 minimum is above it and also binds. A ceiling above $60 or a floor below $60 would not constrain the baseline price.

Compute the two imbalances

Hypothetical rule Qd Qs Short side Imbalance
$50 ceiling 900 700 700 traded 200 shortage
$70 floor 700 900 700 traded 200 surplus

At the ceiling, not all 900 units desired can be traded because only 700 are offered. At the floor, not all 900 units offered can be traded because buyers would purchase 700.

Do not infer incidence from the displayed price

Some buyers can obtain a chair at $50; others may queue, search, pay side fees, accept lower quality, or go without. Some sellers can receive $70; others may sell nothing, carry output, reduce production, or exit. Allocation and enforcement determine who occupies those groups.

The model quantities also do not determine orders, revenue, inventory, losses, or cash. Those require seller-level transaction and accounting evidence. The example establishes bindingness and two quantity gaps—not universal buyer or seller benefit.

Verified calculation · economics foundations analysis

The curriculum loader recomputed this example before it entered the site build. Expand any structured input to inspect the stated facts.

linear markets
1 field
Inspect data
{
  "linden_controls": {
    "demand_intercept_quantity": 1400,
    "demand_quantity_per_price": 10,
    "price_checks": {
      "ceiling_50": 50,
      "equilibrium_60": 60,
      "floor_70": 70
    },
    "supply_intercept_quantity": 200,
    "supply_quantity_per_price": 10
  }
}

Recomputed result

Values recomputed by the curriculum loader
MeasureValue
ceiling 50 below equilibrium1
ceiling 50 quantity demanded900
ceiling 50 quantity supplied700
ceiling 50 short side traded quantity700
ceiling 50 shortage quantity200
equilibrium price60
floor 70 above equilibrium1
floor 70 quantity demanded700
floor 70 quantity supplied900
floor 70 short side traded quantity700
floor 70 surplus quantity200