Misconception · MIS:recoverability-shortfall-equals-impairment-loss

Mistaken idea “The recoverability shortfall equals the impairment loss”

Mistaken reasoning: This mistake subtracts undiscounted cash flows from carrying amount and reports that screening difference as the held and used impairment loss.

Updated Aug 21, 2026 Review due Nov 6, 2026
On this page
  1. Why the model fails
  2. Passing-case diagnostic
  3. Corrective rule

Why this is mistaken

Why the model fails

The two comparisons have different roles. Beacon's $8,000 recoverability shortfall causes the screen to fail. The $16,000 difference between $60,000 carrying amount and $44,000 fair value measures the loss.

Passing-case diagnostic

Change undiscounted cash flows to $62,000 while keeping fair value at $44,000. Within the bounded held-and-used model, the screen passes and no impairment loss is recognized. Someone who still records $16,000 is using the measurement input without first passing through the recognition gate.

Corrective rule

Write the decision sequence before substituting numbers: screen first; if and only if it fails, measure carrying amount less fair value.

Where to watch

When this mistake may appear

  • Carrying amount, undiscounted cash flows, and fair value are all supplied.
  • The recoverability comparison produces one difference and the measurement comparison produces another.
Check your work

Your work may contain this mistake if:

  • Reports carrying amount less undiscounted cash flows as the loss.
  • Uses fair value before determining whether the recoverability screen failed.
  • Records a loss after a passed screen solely because fair value is below carrying amount.