Why this is mistaken
Total surplus is a scoped model sum. It can support a narrow efficiency comparison when demand represents included willingness to pay, supply represents included opportunity cost, allocation is specified, and omitted effects are irrelevant to the question.
Repair the interpretation with an inclusion ledger: buyers, sellers, third parties, ability to pay, distribution, rights, risk, quality, external effects, information, nonmarket values, and future periods. State which dimensions the surplus measure captures and which require separate criteria.
Evidence can compare consequences under declared criteria. It cannot make the choice of criteria disappear.
When this mistake may appear
- Competitive equilibrium maximizes modeled consumer plus producer surplus.
- A policy comparison reports one aggregate welfare area.
Your work may contain this mistake if:
- Calls the maximum fair or ethical by definition.
- Ignores who can express willingness to pay and who is outside the market.
- Omits external effects and rights while calling the measure social welfare.