Misconception · MIS:unusual-means-extraordinary-or-discontinued

Mistaken idea “An unusual event leaves continuing operations”

Mistaken reasoning: This mistake sends an unusual or infrequent event to an old extraordinary category or to discontinued operations without a qualifying disposed component and strategic shift.

Updated Sep 20, 2026 Review due Dec 11, 2026
On this page
  1. Correction
  2. Why the mistake can seem reasonable
  3. Compare the evidence

Correction

Keep a material unusual or infrequent item within continuing operations and present or disclose its nature and financial effects as required. Apply discontinued-operation guidance only to a disposed or held-for-sale component whose disposal represents a strategic shift with a major effect.

Why the mistake can seem reasonable

An unusual event may feel separate from the normal business. US GAAP eliminated the extraordinary-item category, however, and an event does not become a discontinued operation merely because it is rare, severe, or outside management's control.

Compare the evidence

For an unusual or infrequent item, examine the entity's ordinary activities, operating environment, and expected recurrence. For a discontinued operation, define the component, establish its disposal status, and evaluate the strategic shift and major effect. The two analyses answer different questions and can produce different income-statement and tax presentation.

Where to watch

When this mistake may appear

  • A material casualty has no close local precedent.
  • Management describes a closure as unusual or strategic.
Check your work

Your work may contain this mistake if:

  • Uses the extraordinary-item label.
  • Nets an unusual item after tax outside continuing operations.
  • Skips component, disposal, strategic-shift, and major-effect evidence.