Lesson

Roll forward plan assets and returns

Reconcile plan assets and distinguish actual return, expected return, fair value, market related value, contributions, and benefits.

Updated Aug 8, 2026 Review due Nov 8, 2026
On this page
  1. Reconcile fair value from controlled cash flows
  2. Separate actual and expected return
  3. Keep fair value and market-related value distinct
  4. Inspect the asset evidence
  5. Enforce the benefit-payment symmetry
About this lesson

Lesson details

Estimated study time
135 min
Learning objectives (3)

The trustee reports $16.15 million of ending plan assets while the sponsor's cash ledger shows a $1.2 million contribution. Assets increased $1.15 million from the opening balance, but none of those three amounts is automatically the period's investment return.

Reconcile fair value from controlled cash flows

opening fair value of plan assets
  + actual return
  + employer and participant contributions
  + assets acquired
  - benefits paid
  - settlements and expenses paid from the trust
  = ending fair value of plan assets

Cedar Trail's trustee-supported schedule is:

Plan-asset movement Increase / (decrease)
Opening fair value $15,000,000
Actual return 1,050,000
Employer contribution 1,200,000
Benefits paid (1,100,000)
Ending fair value $16,150,000

The $1.05 million actual return is recoverable from the controlled equation: $16.15 million ending - $15.0 million opening - $1.2 million contribution + $1.1 million benefits.

That derivation checks completeness only after all cash flows are proved. An unrecorded trustee fee or transfer would masquerade as investment return.

Separate actual and expected return

The periodic-cost file uses a supplied expected return of $900,000. The asset rollforward uses actual return of $1,050,000. The $150,000 favorable difference participates in the asset gain-and-loss bridge:

Return rail Amount Destination
Actual return $1,050,000 Plan-asset rollforward
Expected return 900,000 Reduction of net periodic pension cost
Actual above expected 150,000 gain OCI/AOCI gain-and-loss layer

Do not put both actual and expected return in expense. Do not replace expected return with actual return merely to make periodic cost match the market. The difference is the reason the gain-and-loss rail exists.

Ending funded status uses the fair value of plan assets. A supported market-related value may be used under the entity's policy for expected return or gain-and-loss amortization. The policy should identify the averaging or smoothing convention, period, consistency, and how the measure reconciles to fair value.

“Smoothed assets” are not a permission to defer an inconvenient fair-value loss on the balance sheet. They are a specific input to specific calculations.

Inspect the asset evidence

Tie the trustee total to:

  • custodian positions and cash;
  • investment manager reports;
  • purchases, sales, income, fees, securities lending, and derivatives;
  • plan contributions received and benefit payments released;
  • fair-value hierarchy and valuation techniques;
  • investments measured at net asset value when applicable;
  • employer securities and other concentrations; and
  • assets transferred in a settlement, acquisition, or plan merger.

The calculation workbook cannot prove existence, title, restrictions, or valuation. Those remain audit, trustee, valuation, and legal questions.

Enforce the benefit-payment symmetry

The $1.1 million benefits paid should reduce both PBO and plan assets. The shared amount is a powerful control:

PBO benefit decrease = plan-asset benefit outflow

Differences can be legitimate, for example, direct employer payments, timing, administrative expenses, insurer settlements, or classification differences, but they require a named explanation and evidence. A silent plug destroys both rollforwards.

The asset file closes when fair value reconciles, actual and expected returns remain separate, benefit payments match the obligation schedule, and every restricted asset movement traces to trustee evidence.